The controversy surrounding the reconstruction – Notre Dame “Disneyland” – should not become cultural

Was the exterior restored or the interior modernized?

The manner in which the damage caused by the fire was repaired and the damaged parts replaced is a matter of heated debate. Should everything be the same as it was before the fire or can it be used as an opportunity to renovate and rebuild?

Diocesan experts presented a plan for the interior decoration of the cathedral, which was approved yesterday by the Department of Monuments Preservation in charge of the Ministry of Culture. There had been protests against these plans before, and critics were by no means silent.

An open letter from hundreds of art historians and intellectuals speaks of the “overall artwork” “kitsch” and “betrayal” of the architecture by the 19th-century architect Eugene Violet-Le-Duck, who renovated Notre Dame.

They call for the cathedral to be restored to its former glory, and to resist the temptations of contemporary art and contemporary art. Otherwise the venerable cathedral will become “Disneyland”.

Church or tourist destination?

It seems surprising that the Church Commission dared to update the interior design. But Notre Dame is also a tourist destination, one of the most important sights in France before the fire, with about ten million visitors from all over the world.

The tour of the Gothic cathedral should be facilitated for them and enriched by video predictions of Bible quotes on the wall. In addition, a kind of dialogue is to be established between historical works, paintings and statues and works of contemporary artists – perhaps instead of very old confessions. Names already mentioned: Anselm Kiefer, Louise Bourgeois or Ernest Pignon-Ernest. This is already a horror idea for conservative critics.

New interior approved

The monument has now approved the project anyway – despite protests. Indoor lights or seats at head height – rows on wheels and electric candles provided. Also, it is stipulated that all the statues of the saints must be in their original place.

The architect of the restoration, Alberic de Montgolfier, calmly said that all the sacred works of art in the cathedral before the fire would remain for the faithful.

This means that the debate over reconstruction will certainly not end there. The actual reconstruction has not yet begun. So far, only the remainder of the fire has been consolidated.

The purpose was to prevent the walls or even the two towers from collapsing or to prevent rain from falling inside through the completely destroyed roof. This preparatory work alone will cost over 100 million euros.